We show that worker wellbeing is determined not only by the amount of compensation workers receive but also by how compensation is determined. While previous theoretical and empirical work has often been preoccupied with individual performance-related pay, we find that the receipt of a range of group-performance schemes (profit shares, group bonuses and share ownership) is associated with higher job satisfaction. This holds conditional on wage levels, so that pay methods are associated with greater job satisfaction in addition to that coming from higher wages. We use a variety of methods to control for unobserved individual and job-specific characteristics. We suggest that half of the share-capitalism effect is accounted for by employees reciprocating for the ?gift? we also show that share capitalism helps dampen the negative wellbeing effects of what we typically think of as ?bad? aspects of job quality. ? 2016 Elsevier B.V.

---

1 October 2016

---

Labour Economics 42, pp.151-158, 2016

---

DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2016.09.002

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537116301051

This Journal article is published under the centre's Community Wellbeing programme, Labour programme.

This publication comes under the following theme: Work and wellbeing