This paper investigates whether the effects of a reform that substantially increased daily instruction time in Chilean primary schools vary depending on school institutions. Focusing on incumbent students and exploiting an IV strategy, we find that longer daily schedules increase reading scores at the end of fourth grade and that the benefits are greater for pupils who began primary education in no-fee charter schools rather than in public schools. We provide evidence that these two types of publicly subsidized establishments, which cater to similar students but differ in their degree of autonomy, expand the teaching input in different ways: in order to provide the additional instruction time, no-fee charter schools rely more on hiring new teachers and less on increasing teachers? working hours than public schools do. ? 2020 Elsevier Ltd

---

1 February 2021

---

Economics of Education Review 802021

---

DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102068

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272775720305549

This Journal article is published under the centre's Labour programme.