NHS REFORMS:
CEP Research Evidence and Policy Recommendations
13 June 2011
Summary of evidence (see summaries of key research below):
- NHS hospital competition can improve quality, lower death rates and improve productivity.
- Hospital competition can improve hospital management.
- The Labour government made huge progress in improving quality, reducing waiting times and raising patient satisfaction between 2000 and 2009.
- Pay regulation has led to higher death rates across England.
- Andrew Lansley's proposals had five flaws:
- The pace was too fast.
- Structural changes cost money; they don't save it.
- They introduced price competition, when they should have preserved strictly quality competition.
- They ignored the value of good management.
- They placed too much power in the hands of untested GP commissioners.
- The NHS requires more hospital competition, not less to improve quality and productivity (See: In brief: Competition in the public sector: good for the goose, good for the gander?, Zack Cooper, June 2011, CentrePiece, Volume 16 Issue 1, Summer 2011);
- The NHS needs to focus on creating financial incentives for hospitals and commissioners to raise performance.
- The NHS needs to measure performance more aggressively and benchmark hospitals' quality.
Dr. Zack Cooper
Tel : 077 258 98597 ; email: z.cooper@lse.ac.uk
Zack Cooper's Webpage
Professor John Van Reenen
email: j.vanreenen@lse.ac.uk
John Van Reenen's Webpage
Further information
See summaries of key CEP research on NHS Policy
Related Links:
In brief: Competition in the public sector: good for the goose, good for the gander?, June 2011, CentrePiece, Volume 16 Issue 1, Summer 2011
The NHS White Paper: Evolution or Revolution, Zack Cooper
Progress Made in the NHS from 2000-2010, Zack Cooper and Alistair McGuire