Skip to main content

Gender gap variation across assessment types: explanations and implications

Georg Graetz and Arizo Karimi


Using Swedish population data, we document that girls outperform boys by a third of a standard deviation in school grades, whereas a gap of similar magnitude but opposite sign persists in SAT scores in the sample of non-randomly selected test takers. We establish that grades capture different attributes than SAT scores, which accounts for much of the variation in gender gaps. A model of SAT participation illustrates how women's greater participation-driven by traits not rewarded by higher scores - leads to their negative selection on observed and unobserved traits. We explore the quantitative importance of this mechanism and conclude that while selection is important, it fails to account for a substantial fraction of the gender gap in SAT scores, suggesting the possibility that the SAT penalizes women.


1 December 2022


Economics of Education Review 912022


DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2022.102313

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775722000863

This Journal article is published under the centre's Labour programme.