Collective bargaining and monopsony: the regulation of noncompete agreements in France
Tito Boeri, Tommaso Crescioli, Andrea Garnero and Lorenzo G. Luisetto
Can collective bargaining mitigate monopsony power? This paper studies the extent to which collective agreements regulating employee noncompete clauses affect firm-level markdowns in French manufacturing. Using a staggered difference-in-differences design, we find that such regulation reduces markdowns by 1.3%?2.2% on average. The effects increase over time and are stronger among smaller, less productive, low-wage firms. Leveraging a French Court of Cassation ruling requiring financial compensation for enforceable noncompetes, we show complementarity between national regulations and sectoral bargaining. By strengthening compliance and adding limitations, collective bargaining emerges as an effective regulatory tool shaping firms' use of noncompete agreements.
27 July 2026
Industrial Relations 2026
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irel.70036
This Journal article is published under the centre's Labour programme.