| This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CEE | CEP | FMG | SERC | STICERD | Cookies? |
|
| ||||
Management Practices and Organisational structures
Also available in Adobe PDF Management Practice and Productivity: Why they Matter by Nick Bloom, Stephen Dorgan, John Dowdy, Christos Genakos, Raffaella Sadun and John Van Reenen OverviewThere are large and persistent differences in organizational performance within detailed sectors that economists find very hard to explain. Traditionally, these differences have been ascribed to management quality, but most of the evidence here comes from case studies. As useful as this qualitative evidence is, there is a dearth of quantitative information on firm-level management practices across countries and sectors.
For an introduction to the work see our piece in the Journal of Economic Perspectives or listen to John Van Reenen's interview online
For further information contact John Van Reenen, Rebecca Homkes, Raffaella Sadun and Nick Bloom For more inforation on the management survey see: http://worldmanagementsurvey.org/ Non-Technical ReportsManagement's Little Black Dress: Essential Practices for Leaders, Harvard Business Review Blog, 9 November 2010 by Raffaella Sadun Management practices in the NHS, CentrePiece 14 (3), Winter 2010 pages 16-19, by Nick Bloom, Carol Propper, Stephan Seiler and John Van Reenen Can better management sustain growth in China and India?, CentrePiece 13 (1) Spring 2008 pages: 10-14, by Nick Bloom and Rebecca Homkes Bossonomics? The Economics of Management and Productivity by Nick Bloom and John Van Reenen Management Practice and Productivity: Why they Matter by Nick Bloom, Stephen Dorgan, John Dowdy, Christos Genakos, Raffaella Sadun and John Van Reenen The Anglo German Foundation Report, Work Life Balance, Management Practices and Productivity by Nick Bloom, Toby Kretschmer and John Van Reenen is the result of joint research by CEP and the McKinsey Group. Published May 2006 by the AGF. Management Practices across Firms & Nations Management Practices, Work-Life Balance and Productivity: A Review of Recent Evidence by John Van Reenen and Nick Bloom, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22 (4), 2006 Management Practices: The Impact on Company Performance by Nick Bloom, Centrepiece Article, Volume 10, Issue 2, Summer 2005. Management Practices Launch MaterialsThe Management Matters research has been launched in many of the 12 countries we have studied. The final section of each presentation offers messages for policy-makers and business leaders in different countries. For the presentations please click on the links below: Management in Healthcare - Launch MaterialsManagement in Healthcare: Why Good Practice Really Matters
Management in Healthcare
Management Practices Launch Materials Management Practice and Productivity: Why They Matter
Management Practices and Productivity Productivity and Management Practices: Why they matter - background The Business Environment: Does Management Matter? Management, Organization and Performance Management and Productivity
Management Matters in New Zealand -
How does manufacturing measure up?
Management Matters in Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland
A Users Guide To Conducting A Management And Organisational Practices SurveyThe first thing to do is to read some of the papers we have published based on the survey to get an overview of the techniques used:
See Nick Bloom and John Van Reenen, Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries, CEP Discussion Paper No 716, March 2006.
For a more academic summary of the methodological lessons, see the short piece New Approaches to Surveying Organizations or the longer version Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries. Christos Genakos, Raffaella Sadun and John Van Reenen Access Free DatasetsWorklife Balance
2004 Project
2006 Project
Work in ProgressPrivate Equity and Management Practices We find that private equity backed firms appear to have significantly better management practices than family firms and government firms. This does not appear to be simply higher powered incentives – we find improvements in shopfloor operations such as lean manufacturing as well as better people management. This suggests the reforms engendered by private equity firms may be deeper and more long-lasting than is often thought.
Worklife Balance Human Resource Management (HRM) and Productivity Improved management practices on targets, monitoring, incentives and operations may improve productivity, but what about the workers? Do they come at the expense of anti-social hours and worse family life? In a series of studies we show that worklife balance is actually complementary with better management practices. Family friendly practices are actually more likely when management quality is high. Competition does not seem to result in worse worklife balance. Contrary to much of the literature, however, we find that the positive association between productivity and family friendly practices disappears when we control for the overall quality of management. For a recent survey of the literature on HRM and productivity see: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp0982.pdf.
Are Family-Friendly Workplace Practices a Valuable Firm Resource? Forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal (Nick Bloom, Toby Kretschmer & John Van Reenen) Management Practices, Work-Life Balance and Productivity: A Review of Some Recent Evidence (Nick Bloom & John Van Reenen) Work-Life Balance, Manangement Practices and Productivity (Nick Bloom, Toby Kretschmer & John Van Reenen) Management in the healthcare sector In 2009-2010 we followed up the hospitals surveyed 3 years earlier and extended this work to examine hospitals in 6 other countries. Results from this analysis are coming soon. See http://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/events/event.asp?id=114 Download the non-technical write up of the research For more of CEP’s work on healthcare and public sector productivity more generally see: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/research/productivity/public_sector.asp In Spring 2006 a small retail pilot on 21 UK retailers was carried out as an investigation into the feasibility of obtaining management and organizational survey data from service sector companies. The summary insights are now available online. During Summer 2009 a team of about 12 people from the Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity managed by Daniela Scur ran a cross-country retail management survey working with the LSE and Stanford team using our standard evaluate methodology. The draft report will be available in Spring 2010. Please contact Nick Bloom or Daniela Scur for details Nick Bloom has lead a joint Berkeley, Stanford and World Bank team running a management practice field experiment in India. The project is working with 20 larger firms (median of 250 employees and 3 production plants) to provide randomized free management consultancy to a treatment group alongside a control group. We are monitoring both groups and evaluating the impact of improved management on firm performance. The management treatment is being carried out by a leading international consulting firm delivering a six month change management program. This treatment is based on a standard commercial consultancy product delivered to manufacturing firms in Asia, Europe and the US. The research will investigate the impact this treatment has on management practices, organizational structure and performance of firms, and the correlation of this with other local factors like skills, regulation, and competitor and international exposure to management best-practice. Kick-off video Non-technical initial overview. Papers relating to the Indian Field Experiment: Does Management Matter? Evidence from India, by Nick Bloom, Benn Eifert, Aprajit Mahajan, David McKenzie and John Roberts
The EBRD and World Bank have run a management and organization survey as part of their BEEPS global firm-level survey. This has collected management data on a number of transitional countries, and the draft report is available in the EBRD’s Transition Report in 2010. Please contact John Van Reenen or Helena Schweiger for details. We are also working with the US and Canadian Census Bureaux to try and run large-scale national census surveys on management practices. The idea is to collect 10,000s of samples to understand in detail the cause of
consequences of management practices across regions, firm-sizes, industries and worker skill levels. We have helped a number of national Governments and overseas research institutes run management surveys to facilitate international comparisons and develop national policies for improving management practices and
productivity. So far Australia, Canada, Chile, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland and New Zealand have all funded and run national management surveys. We are happy to provide full assistance in terms of training
material, software, guidance and training personal to anyone thinking of extending this to other countries. If you are interested please drop John Van Reenen an e-mail. We have used our work in a full set of lecture notes for a short-course of management practices that Nick Bloom and John Van Reenen delivered to Stanford GSB MBA students. These may be helpful for people interested in teaching management practices with a data-driven international approach. We are developing this material into a longer lecture course, with the eventual aim to produce a book broadly overview the management research methodology and results. Management Practices in Schools Ifty Hussain, Tim Besley and Steve Machin have run a pilot examining the measurement of management in schools. The research report of the promising work is available to download in Adobe pdf. The 2006 manufacturing management and organization surveyDuring the Summer of 2006 a team of 45 MBAs and postgraduates at the Centre for Economic Performance surveyed over 3500 firms in the US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Poland, Greece, India, Japan, Korea and China, to collect data on management practices and organizational structures and behaviour. This data is currently being analyzed with first draft results planned for release in Summer 2007. The University research team involved in this project are Christos Genakos (Cambridge & CEP), Raffaella Sadun (LSE & CEP), and John Van Reenen (CEP & LSE).
The 2004 Manufacturing Management SurveyDuring the Summer of 2004 a team of 10 MBAs at the Centre for Economic Performance collected management data from around 750 medium sized manufacturing firms in the UK, US, France and Germany to measure and attempt to explain management practices across firms and nations. The results of this are written up in the paper entitled "Measuring and Explaining Management Practices across Firms and Countries" and "Work Life Balance, Management Practices and Productivity".In Spring 2007 we plan to release a fully anonymized version of the CEP Management Stata dataset and programming files to allow researchers to replicate and extend this research. This is funded by the Anglo-German Foundation, the Advanced Institute for Management and the ESRC.
Organization and DecentralizationThe economics of organization has made huge strides in recent decades. Luis Garicano has been at the forefront of re-thinking of organizational theory and leads the theoretical work. Building on our work on measuring management CEP researchers have made advances in understanding how to examine organizational forms (e.g. decentralization, spans of control) across industries and countries. For an empirical overview see CEP Discussion Paper No 970 For work on the impact of social capital on decentralization see CEP Discussion Paper No 937 For work on the impact of competition on decentrlization see Bloom, Sadun & Van Reenen, American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings Vol. 100, pp 434-438 For work on new technologies on firm organization (testing Garicano's theory of the firm as a knowledge hierachy) see CEP Discussion Paper No 927 and HP Innovation Research Programme Discussion Paper No 12 |
||||
|
Copyright © CEP & LSE 2003 - 2013 | LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Tel: +44(0)20 7955 7673 | Email: cep.info@lse.ac.uk | Site updated 26 May 2013
| ||||