Skip to main content

SERC/Urban and Spatial Programme Discussion Paper

Why Does Birthplace Matter So Much? Sorting, Learning and Geography


We consider the link between birthplace and wages. Using a unique panel dataset we estimate a raw elasticity of wage with respect to birthplace size of 4.6%, two thirds of the 6.8% raw elasticity with respect to city size. We consider a number of mechanisms through which this birthplace effect could arise. Our results suggest that inter-generational transmission (sorting) and the effect of birthplace on current location (geography) both play a role in explaining the effect of birthplace. We find no role for human capital formation at least in terms of educational outcomes (learning). Our results highlight the importance of intergenerational sorting in helping explain the persistence of spatial disparities.


Clément Bosquet and Henry G. Overman

22 January 2016     Paper Number SERCDP0190

Download PDF - Why Does Birthplace Matter So Much? Sorting, Learning and Geography

This SERC/Urban and Spatial Programme Discussion Paper is published under the centre's Urban programme.

This publication comes under the following theme: Urban inequality: The role and determinants of urban productivity