| This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CEE | CEP | FMG | SERC | STICERD |
|
| ||||
The Natural Resource Curse
Research in this area includes work by Francesco Caselli and Tom Cunningham Meanwhile, CEP macro program members Francesco Caselli and Tom Cunningham discuss political economy mechanisms which explain why an increase in the size of resource rents causes a decrease in the economy’s total value added. They find that resource abundance may either induce greater investment by the leader in assets that favour growth, or alter incentives which leads to a potentially catastrophic drop in such activities, leading to a resource curse. Resource windfalls result in higher revenues which both increase the value of staying in power and increase the likelihood that the leader will face a challenge for his political control. There are two broad scenarios under which an increase in the value of staying in power can lead to a resource curse. In the case of a binding budget or time constraint, the leader substitutes away from productive activities into activities that preserve him in power. If the leader is unconstrained, activities undertaken by the leader to stay in power can have a negative spillover on the private sector and can also lead to a fall in living standards. An increase in the likelihood of a challenge for political control from more aggressive and motivated opponents will shorten the leader’s horizon, and hence his perceived returns from developing the non-resource economy. This effect can be exacerbated if the leader responds to the greater probability of a challenge by shifting more resources into wasteful self-preservation schemes. To read more about the natural resource curse see:
|
||||
|
Copyright © CEP & LSE 2003 - 2012 | LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Tel: +44(0)20 7955 7673 | Email: cep.info@lse.ac.uk | Site updated 16 May 2012
| ||||