| This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CEE | CEP | FMG | SERC | STICERD | Cookies? |
|
| ||||
New Economic Geography
Top Row: Fabrice Defever, Guy Michaels, Giordano Mion, Gianmarco Ottaviano, Henry Overman Bottom Row: Ferdinand Rauch, Stephen Redding, Daniel Sturm, and Silvana Tenreyro. An overwhelming feature of economic activity is its spatial unevenness. It manifests in income disparities between countries and regions, the clustering of industries, and the formation of urban systems. We want to explain the location of economic activity and how this affects productivity and living standards in different countries, across regions and within cities. An important innovative element in our approach is that we draw out complementarities between studying international and sub-national spatial issues. We collaborate closely with the Spatial Economics Research Centre who take a more traditional spatial/urban economics approach. In recent years the European Union expanded eastwards to include several former communist countries. The integration of these countries into the EU provides a number of challenges and opportunities including migration, competition in product markets, and the outsourcing of labour-intensive production to lower cost locations. One of the most dramatic examples of this regional integration was the reunification of West and East Germany in 1990. CEP research explores the implications of Germany's division and reunification for the spatial distribution of economic activity within West Germany (CEP Discussion Paper No 688, later published in American Economic Review). This research shows that cities close to the new border between East and West Germany disproportionately lost market access following Germany's division, due to the loss of nearby trading partners accessible at low transportation costs. The German reunification began to reverse these relative differences between border and non-border cities. Further work has pinpointed some of the mechanisms that shape the modern urban economy (CEP Discussion Paper No 1154). This research contrasts economic activity within Berlin before, during and after the fall of the Berlin Wall to better understand and quantify the impact of concentrated worker pools and consumers in cities. The shift from rural to urban settlement has a wide range of implications for infrastructure, public health, environment and economic performance. As a result, urbanisation is central to many policy debates and is viewed as a key part of economic development. While this urban transition is largely complete in countries such as the United States, urbanisation continues swiftly in Brazil, China and India. Although urbanisation involves large-scale restructuring of the economy, much of our existing knowledge comes from research that excludes rural areas. Using a novel dataset that encompasses both the United States and Brazil, CEP research provides new findings on urbanisation (CEP Discussion Paper No 892, later published in Quarterly Journal of Economics). For example, the well known Gibrat's Law (that population growth is independent of population size) breaks down outside of large cities. The findings suggest a stronger distinction is needed between polices for urban and rural areas. The CEP's research is often featured in international news coverage and is influential in informing public debate. Some recent policy issues discussing work of the New Economic Geography include:
SERC Discussion Paper
CEP Discussion Paper The Economics of Density: Evidence from the Berlin Wall Gabriel M. Ahlfeldt, Stephen J. Redding, Daniel M. Sturm, Nikolaus Wolf, June 2012 Paper No' CEPDP1154: Read Abstract | Full paper CEP Discussion Paper Agglomeration, Trade and Selection Gianmarco I. P. Ottaviano, February 2012 Paper No' CEPDP1129: Read Abstract | Full paper CEP Discussion Paper Spatial Frictions Kristian Behrens, Giordano Mion, Yasusada Murata, Jens Südekum, December 2011 Paper No' CEPDP1108: Read Abstract | Full paper CEP Discussion Paper Spatial Exporters Fabrice Defever, Benedikt Heid, Mario Larch, December 2011 Paper No' CEPDP1100: Read Abstract | Full paper CEP Discussion Paper The Spatial Organization of Multinational Firms Fabrice Defever, December 2010 Paper No' CEPDP1029: Read Abstract | Full paper CEP Discussion Paper Trading Partners and Trading Volumes: Implementing the Helpman-Melitz-Rubinstein Model Empirically J. M. C. Santos Silva, Silvana Tenreyro, June 2009 Paper No' CEPDP0935: Read Abstract | Full paper CEP Discussion Paper The Empirics of New Economic Geography Stephen Redding, April 2009 Paper No' CEPDP0925: Read Abstract | Full paper CEP Discussion Paper Economic Geography: A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature Stephen Redding, January 2009 Paper No' CEPDP0904: Read Abstract | Full paper CEP Discussion Paper Why Capital does not Migrate to the South: A New Economic Geography Perspective Jang Ping Thia, November 2008 Paper No' CEPDP0895: Read Abstract | Full paper CEP Discussion Paper Survival of the Fittest in Cities: Agglomeration, Selection, and Polarisation Kristian Behrens, Frédéric Robert-Nicoud, October 2008 Paper No' CEPDP0894: Read Abstract | Full paper CEP Discussion Paper Urbanisation and Structural Transformation Guy Michaels, Ferdinand Rauch, Stephen Redding, October 2008 Paper No' CEPDP0892: Read Abstract | Full paper |
||||
|
Copyright © CEP & LSE 2003 - 2013 | LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Tel: +44(0)20 7955 7673 | Email: cep.info@lse.ac.uk | Site updated 21 May 2013
| ||||