| This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CEE | CEP | FMG | SERC | STICERD | Cookies? |
|
| ||||
Abstract for:
Philippe
Aghion,
John
Van Reenen,
Luigi
Zingales,
February 2009
Paper No' CEPDP0911: | Full paper Save Reference as: BibTeX File | EndNote Import File
Keywords: Innovation; institutional ownership, career concerns, R&D, productivity JEL Classification: O31; O32; O33; G20; G32 Is hard copy/paper copy available? YES - Paper Copy Still In Print. This Paper is published under the following series: CEP Discussion Papers Share:
Google Bookmarks |
Facebook |
Twitter
Abstract:We find that institutional ownership in publicly traded companies is associated with more innovation (measured by cite-weighted patents). To explore the mechanism through which this link arises, we build a model that nests the lazy-manager hypothesis with career-concerns, where institutional owners increase managerial incentives to innovate by reducing the career risk of risky projects. The data supports the career concerns model. First, whereas the lazy manager hypothesis predicts a substitution effect between institutional ownership and product market competition (and managerial entrenchment generally), the career-concern model allows for complementarity. Empirically, we reject substitution effects. Second, CEOs are less likely to be fired in the face of profit downturns when institutional ownership is higher. Finally, using instrumental variables, policy changes and disaggregating by type of owner we find that the effect of institutions on innovation does not appear to be due to endogenous selection.This paper has been published as: American Economic Review 2013, 103(1): 277–304 |
||||
|
Copyright © CEP & LSE 2003 - 2013 | LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Tel: +44(0)20 7955 7673 | Email: cep.info@lse.ac.uk | Site updated 24 May 2013
| ||||