| This centre is a member of The LSE Research Laboratory [RLAB]: CASE | CEE | CEP | FMG | SERC | STICERD | Cookies? |
|
| ||||
Abstract for:
Christos
Genakos,
Kai Uwe
Kühn,
John
Van Reenen,
June 2007
Paper No' CEPCP223: | Full paper Save Reference as: BibTeX File | EndNote Import File
Keywords: JEL Classification: Is hard copy/paper copy available? YES - Paper Copy Still In Print. This Paper is published under the following series: CentrePiece Magazine Share:
Google Bookmarks |
Facebook |
Twitter
Abstract:The antitrust cases against Microsoft in the United States and Europe have been the most high profile implementation of competition law in the last 20 years. Christos Genakos, Kai Uwe Kühn and John Van Reenen look at the key economic issues, notably what they imply for the conduct of competition policy in high-tech industries dominated by rapid innovation.CentrePiece 12 (1) Summer 2007 pages: 2-7 This paper has been published as: The Incentives of a Monopolist to Degrade Interoperability: Theory and Evidence from the Personal Computer and Server Market by Christos Genakos, Kai Uwe Kühn and John Van Reenen, CEP mimeo 'Some Economics of European Commission versus Microsoft' by Kai Uwe Kühn and John Van Reenen, forthcoming in Cases in European Competition Policy: The Economic Analysis edited by Bruce Lyons (Cambridge University Press). |
||||
|
Copyright © CEP & LSE 2003 - 2013 | LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE | Tel: +44(0)20 7955 7673 | Email: cep.info@lse.ac.uk | Site updated 23 May 2013
| ||||