LSE CEP LSE
Centre for Economic Performance (CEP)

Abstract for:

Entry and Asymmetric Lobbying: Why Governments Pick Losers

Richard E.  Baldwin,  Frédéric  Robert-Nicoud,  May 2007
Paper No' CEPDP0791: | Full paper (pdf)
Save Reference as: BibTeX BibTeX File | Endote EndNote Import File
Keywords: Lobbying; Sunset Industries, Sunk Costs

JEL Classification: H32; P16

Is hard copy/paper copy available? YES - Paper Copy Still In Print.
This Paper is published under the following series: CEP Discussion Papers
Share: Google Bookmarks Google Bookmarks | Facebook Facebook | Twitter Twitter

Abstract:

Governments frequently intervene to support domestic industries, but a surprising amount of this support goes to ailing sectors. We explain this with a lobbying model that allows for entry and sunk costs. Specifically, policy is influenced by pressure groups that incur lobbying expenses to create rents. In expanding industries, entry tends to erode such rents, but in declining industries, sunk costs rule out entry as long as the rents are not too high. This asymmetric appropriability of rents means losers lobby harder. Thus it is not that government policy picks losers, it is that losers pick government policy.